
7 June 2019 - Am I entitled to a property settlement?

One of the common misconceptions in family law is that you need to have been in a de facto relationship for more than two years in order to have a property settlement. What people don’t realise, however, is that the Court also has the power to make Orders for a property settlement if there is a child of the relationship or if one party has made significant contributions (directly or indirectly) to the asset pool and failing to make Orders would result in a serious injustice to that party.
The recent
decision in Volpe & Stark [2019] FCCA 692 has reinforced the Court’s
position in relation to property settlements of relationships of less than two
years. In that case, the parties had been in a de facto relationship for only
13 months. The parties had, however, purchased a property together which was
held by them as tenants in common in equal shares, notwithstanding the fact
that Ms Vople had provided the majority of the funds required to enable the
property to be purchased.
After
hearing evidence as to Ms Vople’s contributions towards the property, the Court
found that a failure to make an order would result in a serious injustice to Ms
Vople, given her substantial contributions to the property and the fact that
the property was held as tenants in common in equal shares and would continue
to be held that way should Orders not be made.
If you have recently separated and are unsure as
to whether or not you are entitled to a property settlement, make an
appointment to meet with one of our family law team today to investigate your
options.









